We received this anonymous email, that we're posting here verbatim below, and someone submitted a comment which is a reasoned response to Mr John Lee's latest email with the BGM/BGV price comparison (under comments):
I’m confused when I received Mr Lee's recent letter about the AGM.
Firstly, he wrote that Mr Tan Lai Huat’s resolution was not approved by the council. Isn’t Mr Tan Tew still the chairperson of the management council? Since when did Mr Lee become the spokesperson for the entire council when he is only a member?
Secondly, he said that the resolution is an en-bloc matter and nothing to do with estate management and urged owners who support the en-bloc to pass him their proxies. He signed off his letter as Chairman, Collective Sales Committee (CSC) and the letter was sent using BGV En-bloc letterhead.
I’m confused:
Mr Lee firstly objected to the resolution because it is an en-bloc matter which should not be tabled at the forthcoming AGM and he seemed to be speaking on behalf of the council. But he then objected to the resolution because he asserts it is Mr Tan's "cunning way of killing off the current enbloc attempt."
So in what capacity is Mr Lee objecting in - as an ordinary Council member who is working on behalf of all owners to manage BGV or as Chairman of the CSC who is working to sell off the estate?
The answer seems quite clear. And what is the view of the MC Chairperson on this matter, or has Mr Lee taken over this other committee too?
I’m confused when I received Mr Lee's recent letter about the AGM.
Firstly, he wrote that Mr Tan Lai Huat’s resolution was not approved by the council. Isn’t Mr Tan Tew still the chairperson of the management council? Since when did Mr Lee become the spokesperson for the entire council when he is only a member?
Secondly, he said that the resolution is an en-bloc matter and nothing to do with estate management and urged owners who support the en-bloc to pass him their proxies. He signed off his letter as Chairman, Collective Sales Committee (CSC) and the letter was sent using BGV En-bloc letterhead.
I’m confused:
Mr Lee firstly objected to the resolution because it is an en-bloc matter which should not be tabled at the forthcoming AGM and he seemed to be speaking on behalf of the council. But he then objected to the resolution because he asserts it is Mr Tan's "cunning way of killing off the current enbloc attempt."
So in what capacity is Mr Lee objecting in - as an ordinary Council member who is working on behalf of all owners to manage BGV or as Chairman of the CSC who is working to sell off the estate?
The answer seems quite clear. And what is the view of the MC Chairperson on this matter, or has Mr Lee taken over this other committee too?
